Superhelde Movie


This post is about Superhelde, a film that I had the pleasure of working on. I wrote a little blurb about it while shooting but thought it is worth a lot more when yesterday I went through my Flikr collections and found on-set pictures amongst them. A brilliantly funny film in the vein of Mallrats, Napoleon Dynamite, Nacho Libre and Bakgat.

Keep reading →

A Hitch Hiking Documentary

UPDATE
We’ve been able to secure a great collection of media sponsors. The next drive is toward advertising spots within these media channels.

The documentary will follow two guys as they (you guessed it) hitch-hike across South Africa during the World Cup. Along the way they will be meeting crazy, funny, interesting and hopefully opinionated people including a Rasta Community in the Transkei, a soccer team in PE and meet with the guy who drove the the Magic Bus in the 70’s…

Visit our Blog and join us on the trip through FB

Keep reading →

It’s always been about Hybrid

Distributing pictures and making a decent return has always been a multi-diciplinary project. In the 80’s it was about making ancillary-products, 90’s VHS and DVD and now? This online game has thrown everybody and so the innovators try and fail, the cynics sit on the fence and say it will never work and alot of us hope for the best.

From a great new site I found called Magnet Media. Ive used again only excerpts so chech it yourself and become wise - nobody is gonna do it for you!

Th Panel was: Efe Cakarel, Graham Leggat, Peter Becker, Sara Pollack

Keep reading →

The return of Zombie

Its all been Vampires lately, Zombies are soon back and they mean more to us than we give them credit for.

I’ve been researching Zombie flicks over the last little while and have now had the pleasure of watching Zach Sniders “Dawn of the dead” (which is a superbly crafted narrative) and Norwegian recent called “Dead Snow” - a gory romp of Nazi Zombies in snow, its amazing!

Keep reading →

$100K Paramount Plan

I heard late last year (post the Paranormal Activity phenomenon) that a studio was going to start a devision to produce a slew of $100K features. 20 a year to be exact, which is a lousy $2 milj a year. Thats about the make-up budget on a normal studio picture. Don’t get me wrong, I’m hardly criticizing, I think its a great idea and more than that it goes to show that we as independents are onto something that the studio wants. Every time we make a film we walk that line of break-throuhg VS failure and that makes us innovative and highly creative.

Keep reading →

Why Film?!

If your lost regarding what is digital and how it works you really should go and read Richard Lackeys blog dcinema. Ok i confess he’s a good friend but also a freakin tech genius working out ways on how to make film-making easier for indie film makers. Besides having come up with some great business ideas regarding post production and finance he loves film, no you don’t understand, he owns his own 16mm and 35 film camera and actually still shoots on film. Beautiful.
Anyway, here is a snippet of one of his latest posts on why using film in a digital boom is still tops.

We all know that here and now, HD is the high-end standard for broadcast and home entertainment, and at 6% more resolution, 2K or 2048 x 1556 pixels is the best we get in the majority of digital cinemas. Here in South Africa, we currently finish to 2K for film recording.

What happens 10 years from now when 4K becomes the standard in cinema and in the home? This will happen, and if you’ve originated in HD, you’re out of luck, you will never ever have more than 1080 lines of image information.

If you’ve shot 35mm, or even 16mm film, you will be able to go back to the neg and rescan at 4K, even 8K from your EDL and reconform.

In a DI (Digital Intermediate) environment, your grade is all metadata, so if you’ve saved the project, the process should be a simple re-conform. This is part of the beauty of a high-end digital finish and metadata based, non-destructive tools.

Go and read the the rest of it here and remember to write what you think afterward!

peace.

Share

Branded Content

Branded Content - remember those BMW ads that came out a couple of years ago. Suddenly the idea of films made by brands became real. The explosive nature of the internet and so the death of many newspapers and magazines further drove brands to seek new ways for their audiences to know and think about them. We have seen AD banners on Youtube videos, overt branding in films and also television series and the holy grail, the artful product made with the mounds of money from a corporate - the branded content.

Last year I was playing with some ideas of raising finance for a film entirely from a corporate entity. I know there are a couple of folks out there going out and pitching this idea and looking for it to stick - it makes sense. If a brand buys in it becomes an extension of the branded line of goods. You may sell chips but now you are reaching an audience that previously hasn’t paid attention to your brand. Making a film for example puts your brand in the living room of the consumer for years to come. If the film story is good your “brand narrative” has just grown and in a world where words like multi-platform are turning geeks into millionaires why not go there. This beats online ARG anytime, its real life brand integration.

As film makers or content producers what are we doing to maximize our talent and ability to create content for brands. What are our options to create branded content. Is it (dare I say) “selling out”. To those that say yes, well good luck. My latest treat is Spike Jonze’ Absolut Vodka incarnation. It looks beautiful, its a great little story and it further locks the brand of Absolut into the minds of consumers. Jean-Pierre Jeunet has recently done a short for perfume Chanel N5, Lynch did one for Gucci and so did Chris Cunningham. Brands realize that they need to expand the “edibility” of their product. They do that by widening the possibilities of how consumers find and interact with their brands.

I know within Agencies the wave of “interaction”, “web 2.0” and “multi-platform” commercials may be subsiding but its far from over. Brands need to know that you are thinking about them. As film makers we make people think about things and more than that we aim to emotionally move an audience from one space to another. In other words what we do is what brands are looking for. However we are un-trained in the commercial speak and I think we loose out because of it.

I feel branded content still has a long way to go before it reaches it’s peak. Further than that as film makers we need to start seeing ourselves as a unique entity. with that I mean finding a voice/style that is yours, each one of these film makers get to do the awesome stuff because it is recognizable to an audience. Be brave regarding that, finding what makes you unique as a story teller. I think someone getting that right at the moment is Sean Metelerkamp. He directed the Die Antwoord music vid’s and has done some phenomenal photographic images for Fokofpolisiekar, Velocity films as well as Fly on the Wall.

However I digress. Here is a nice interview from The Workbook Project about misconceptions of branded entertainment:

Creative Director Tim Roper from award winning advertising agency Crispin Porter + Bogusky. Interview by Peter Katz.

What do you feel are the biggest misconceptions about branded content?
The biggest misconception is how easy it is to conceive it in a fresh way and then how willing people are to consume it when it’s not fresh. Even though great branded content is a great thing, it’s extremely rare and certainly not something consumers are actively demanding.

How do you effectively balance the responsibilities of creating content that competes with the entertainment quality of popular culture, while at the same getting consumers to buy more stuff?
That’s the key: If you think about the bar for ad content as being all the funniest, most poignant, most compelling and entertaining stuff that the rest of pop culture is cranking out, then you’re going to inevitably shoot higher. Few companies are doing that. As for consumers, it’s all about truth, really. Whether they realize it or not, audiences look for truth in things. In music, film, television….They want to relate to things. So when they can recognize a kernel of truth in ANY content with an entertaining wrapper, they embrace it. So, start with the truth, set the bar high and you’ll achieve that balance you’re talking about. Hopefully.

In a couple years will more entertainment be branded content?
I imagine so. But, if it is, I sure hope people push as hard on making the content actually entertaining as they do on dreaming up the vehicles or pitching the increased spend. Because for every BMW films or overtly “green” 30 Rock episode, there’s a dozen silly, contrived videos about mayonnaise or BBQ sauce or head-scratching web labyrinths for some car company that just aren’t begging to be engaged with.

Branded content, also known as Branded entertainment and Product placement, is a relatively new form of advertising medium that blurs conventional distinctions between what constitutes advertising and what constitutes entertainment. Branded content is essentially a fusion of the two into one product intended to be distributed as entertainment content, albeit with a highly branded quality. Branded content, unlike conventional forms of entertainment content, is generally funded entirely by a brand or corporation rather than, for example, a Movie studio or a group of producers. However, it can be argued that this is just a new name for the same type of marketing that was pioneered by soap manufacturers in the early days of radio and television with the soap opera.” (Wikipedia)

Social Sound Design

Andrew Spitz recently launched a new project called Social Sound Design which is developed for sound designers and non-sound designers to find answers to tricky sound questions. Ranging from programming in Max/MSP to gear problems and for me what is the best advice to record sound on set.

Go check it out and post an answer or a question! I got great answers to my questions which you can see here:

Working on Set

Pictures by Jozua and David

These Pics where taken on-set of the latest film I’m working on as 1st Ad - SuperHelde. Its a teen comedy based in Johannesburg about a group of friends who fight to save their comic book store - many LOL.

The point of this little post though is to highlight what can be done with alot of passion, good planning and a super team of young film makers. Pre-production started in November last year with casting and director planning. Slowly the whole crew has been brought on board and given enough time to prep sufficiently. There never is enough time or money and everyone is taking a little cut in rates to make it happen however that has never deterred this team to make very day so far on time and delivering a top notch product.

The team really has pulled together over the last two weeks of shoot and even the director helps in the evening to wrap up gear or pack away chairs. All this has meant is proper turn around times for everyone and a feeling of ‘all for one-ness”… The team is predominantly pre-thirty which goes to show that age and experience (although great) is not the be-all-and-end-all of film making. This is a commercial film for cinema and as far as I can tell its going to be one of the funniest coming out of SA this year.

Follow the progress of the shoot on my Twitter or search #superhelde for trend.

This.Is.Rad.

Creativity, Systems, Processes

Sitting in LuLu in Johannesburg with my long time friend Andrew Spitz (www.soundplusdesign.com) sharing links, contacts and cool blogs as we do (LOL). He pointed me to a great blog called the99percent which is written for creative professionals like you and I. This particular post (linked above) deals with creatives and systems. Its so often that we think the two are directly apposed where in fact they should be synonyms. This post laid it out so simply and clearly that I had no choice but to share it - enjoy!

Too Summize:

  1. ROUTINES
    Many creative people lead apparently boring working lives, sticking to the same routine every day. They do this because they understand instinctively what neuroscience has now confirmed – routine is a key that unlocks creative inspiration.

Circadian rhythms of arousal and mental alertness mean that certain times of day are especially conducive to focused creative work. The effect is magnified when familiar objects, surroundings, and other stimuli (coffee, background music) become associative triggers for creative states of mind.

  1. SYSTEMS
    A rock-solid productivity system performs a dual function for your creativity: (1) It ensures that all ideas and action steps are captured, so that nothing slips through the cracks, in your own work and within your team, and (2) When you are confident that everything important has been captured, you are free to focus fully on the task in hand.

Systems are different from routines, since they are not dependent on circumstances. Major events can play havoc with your routine. When this happens, a good system acts as a safety net.

  1. SPONTANEITY
    Real creativity involves spontaneity and surprise, whether a simple “Aha!” moment or the lightning bolt of inspiration. Paradoxically, the harder you work at routines and systems, the more likely you are to experience that bolt from the blue.

Archimedes wouldn’t have had his bathtub revelation if he hadn’t been working hard on problems of volume and density. Coleridge’s notebooks show that much of the groundwork for “Kubla Khan” had been done in the months leading up to his famous opium trip.

Please go there to check out the rest and read what Stephen King does to ensure his creative process!

Miramax Dies on Thursday

Its 1996, I’m 14 and in the USA visiting family. Somehow I got to watch Pulp Fiction that holiday and it had a great effect on me. Obviously. It was Miramax that presented that picture. It was Miramax that presented a slew of my top films since then including “Sex, Lies and Videotape”, “Clerks”, “The Aviator” and many more memorable pictures that have defined the last two decades of Film-art. As much as this is true Miramax was also the epitome of the Film-business with Bob and Harvey Weinstein at the helm of the 31 year old company.

Bob and Harvey where hard, crude, unforgiving hustlers who had a knack for finding talent, exploiting it and then winning oscars. Thats a very short synopsis and almost unfair to the creators of a sterling company that was feared, admired and hated in much of the film industry during the eighties and nineties. Coming from a record sales background the Weistein Bros moved to film where they saw a ever growing space for hard nose sales with smaller “indy” films. Video had become popular and film makers could access film stock with a couple of credit cards. Enter Tarintino, Soderberg, Smith and some young actors full of passion and talent all looking for a home and someone who would believe in their vision. Of coarse these are not the only filmmakers that came out of Miramax they just happen to be the most prolific and have always returned to their “roots” by making films with or for Bob and Harvey.

“Miramax wasn’t just a bad-boy clubhouse, it was a 20th century Olympus,” filmmaker Kevin Smith wrote to TheWrap. “Throw a can of Diet Coke and you hit a modern-day deity. And for one brief, shining moment, it was an age of magic and wonders.”

In my opinion the era ended with the sale to Disney in 1993. Although it gave them a huge bank account and overdraft it immediately marginalized the brothers and they moved to making “Oscar films” as opposed to just making great films that won Oscars. Theres a difference. This sale became a trend and soon all the major studios owned or opened an “Indy” devision. Too bad the trend has now turned around and all the Majors are closing the “indies”. I guess the wheel turns right.

“Miramax worked best when it was an independent company where every single film was nurtured by Harvey Weinstein,” said David Davis, managing partner of Santa Monica, California-based Arpeggio Partners, which advises movie industry investors.

Soon Bob and Harvey where having shouting matches with Disney CEO Michael Eisner and to no-ones surprise the brothers left Miramax in 2005 to open The Weinstein Company. Even now they struggle to make their studio work, as if someone stole their magic… By the time they had left, Miramax had 220 Oscar nominations for films including “Pulp Fiction,” “The Aviator” and “Life Is Beautiful.”

Miramax closing their doors is a sad day. It stood for so much and gave so many film makers the belief that they too could win an oscar if only they worked hard enough. Thats a big dream to have made it into everyday reality and its all thanks to two hard knocks with foul mouths.

If you want to know know more about the Sundance, Weinstein phenomenon then pick up Down and Dirty Pictures - its a great read!

WGSA Saturday Meeting

Being back in Johannesburg one thing has become clear, we are here to work. As opposed to say life in Cape Town where we are here to live. Having said that, I made the effort and got up at 8am on Saturday morning and went to a (not beach alas) meeting. This was the first Writers Guild of South Africa meeting in Johannesburg for 2010 and the turn-out was small. Luckily it wasn’t raining and at 9.30 we promptly got started.

The point of the day was to inform everyone what the writers guild was doing and then have two guest speakers, one from the NFVF and the other from M-net. The WGSA is on a mission to become “professional”. It now has a mandate, a “corporate strategy” and a 5 year goal. ALthough, to be honest I thought there was alot of rhetoric and am still not sure what it is that is going to change. It felt like a bunch of writers wanting to be Vice Presidents and CEO’s without actually being VP’s and CEO’s…It’s still early days and good intentions are good to have, hopefully my judgement is misplaced and the mission statements will become tangible.

The WGSA is setting up to become the go-to organization for writers and producers alike, and will include everything from protecting writers against evil producers who wont pay them to helping them protect their copyright. One thing that has changed and was mentioned time and again, the WGSA (and now the NFVF also) are taking drastic steps to NOT be the up-liftment, teaching, nurturing, placement organization it has become. Instead they expect writers to go out, be pro-active, write more and complain less. I like it. The backlash I feel is inevitable and some kids are surely going to protest (luckily writers don’t toi-toi) in the name of seeking opportunity and help into the hard, unforgiving “industry”. Where have all the good people gone they will ask?

The good people are becoming serious and this was where they could say it. The NFVF, represented by Clarence Hamilton
Head of Development and Production started with some statistics (because the numbers talk cough) which where quite frightening. In the last 15 years of film industry and 10 years the NFVF has lived there have been 135 movies made with a gross of R220 million. Out of that total gross most of that income has come from 6 films and one film maker, Leon Schuster. wow. Furthermore, the NFVF has not seen a cent back for any of their investment and quite frankly I wouldn’t have expected the movies they have backed to recoup their investment. My question to Clarence was what will change NOW that will curb the trend toward “backing the wrong horse”(as one of the writers said post meeting)? Unfortunately the answer was vague at best and after hearing three films the NFVF is backing now I’m not sure the trend will change any time soon.

When my script is complete though I am going to take it there and see for myself how the process goes, I hope to be pleasantly surprised mostly because of my low expectations… What was disheartening was that the average film budgets (from the stats) was R9 million. This is such a high number and it seems that the NFVF is ok with that. No wonder they struggle to make back investment. There is a lot of restructuring going on at the moment and I wish the NFVF all the best in trying to get the machine to work. Obviously it has potential (and R40 million a year budget) so by all respects it should work, it just hasn’t yet.

Finally Anne Davis from the new local content division at M-net shared what her company was hoping to do. What was great was her enthusiasm and obvious passion for good(!) local produce, written well and made on relatively good budgets. “If its not world class we wont bother” was something she said. I say to that GREAT! The thing that really got me going was her empathetic discourse on global media colonization in Africa and how it is up to us as creatives to either allow or curb this trend. The only way to do it is to play on the same field and never pull the “feel sorry for us poor Africans” card. YES! Realism is refreshing isn’t it… The fact is that we are a continent of amazing potential for extending corporate business and its not long before NBC or Viacom realize this and actually take it for themselves. And why not, we’re not doing much to stop them.

After the meeting Anne was inundated with writers trying to pitch their latest and greatest endeavor. Her answer; “wait for my briefs to come out, keep an eye on the website and make sure you are part of the WGSA because that is where I plan on finding my writers.” Good news for the WGSA and hopefully for some writers too!

A half day well spent I thought on my way to a wine tasting session (who would have thought in Johannesburg, full of surprises) leaving there knowing I am going to see some top entertainment come out of SA over the next 24 months. I cant wait!

For more information go to WGSA, NFVF and M-net

Avatar = Pocahontas in one JPG

Theres nothing more to say…

The Dude Abides

Trying to write comedy is hard - I know not because I’m writing a comedy (actually writing it) but because I’ve worked on various comedies and read comedy scripts. Its hard. Now Im developing an idea which is largely comedy so my research takes me into the comedy world. Although there is alot out there, there are not many comedies that become social comment and finally cult symbols for societies. The Big Labowski however is one of those films. More than being a flippin cool movie it has transcended to become a religious reference and even in some cases a religion onto itself. Now that is comedy!

Dudeism, the faith that abides in The Big Lebowski

Ben Walters
guardian.co.uk

I understand what it means to say that there is an omnipotent, benevolent creator,” Ethan Coen asserted in his Princeton thesis, Two Views of Wittgenstein’s Later Philosophy, “and that claim strikes me as the height of stupidity.” We can only wonder what Coen makes of the fact that he and his brother Joel have created a – well, I won’t say a god because what’s a god? – peculiar object of contemporary veneration.

On its release in 1998, The Big Lebowski was not one of the Coens’ more successful films. The convoluted film noir pastiche was built around the amiably flaky Venice Beach dropout – and singularly ill-equipped ad-hoc private eye – known as the Dude (Jeff Bridges). A deadbeat and a loser to the square community, he nevertheless maintains a certain baked poise, consistently eschewing conflict and self-advancement to cultivate recreation and friendship. “I won’t say [he’s] a hero,” hedges the Stranger, the film’s bumbling cowboy narrator, at its opening, “because what’s a hero? But sometimes there’s a man who, well, he’s the man for his time and place.”

In the decade since its underwhelming debut, The Big Lebowski has become the scripture of the new century’s most devout movie cult and the Dude its godhead, his words respectfully cited by the movie’s fans, or Achievers. Such quotation is, of course, is a hallmark of movie cultdom but even by such reverent standards, appreciation of Lebowski has been conspicuously religiose.

It perhaps helps that matters of religious observance are attended to, grotesquely, in the film itself. Walter (John Goodman), the Dude’s apoplectic bowling partner, cleaves fiercely to the tenets of his adopted Judaism, resulting in a dogmatic contretemps when a game is scheduled for a Saturday. “I don’t roll on Shabbas!” Walter barks, to the snorting derision of his oleaginous competitor Jesus Quintana (John Turturro), who offers a foul-mouthed recapitulation of Christ’s rejection of orthodoxy: “What’s this ‘day of rest’ shit? What’s this bullshit? I don’t fucking care! It don’t matter to Jesus!”

The bowling lane is not, it seems, as debased a site for such theological debate as one might suppose. In “Fuck It, Let’s Go Bowling”: The Cultural Connotations of Bowling in The Big Lebowski – one of the 21 scholarly articles about the movie collected in The Year’s Work in Lebowski Studies, recently published by Indiana University Press – Bradley D Clissold points out the sport’s origins in Kegelspiel, the German game in which pins stood for heathens, the ball righteousness. Clissold reports that Luther had a lane at home and has photographed a statue in Newfoundland that looks distinctly like Christ holding a bowling ball.

Lanes are now congregation sites for members of the Lebowski Fest movement, a circuit of events grounded in the Dude-approved sacraments of bowling, smoking pot and drinking White Russians. Soon after its establishment in 2002, photographs began to appear of Achievers holding chapter-and-verse signs referring to fest dates – for instance, “Lebowski 6:19”. It’s also not unusual to find festgoers dressed as Moses or the Pope – neither appears on screen but both are mentioned in dialogue. Many fest costumes are exegetical like that.

In The Achievers, a documentary by Eddie Chung about Lebowski fandom recently released on DVD, one Moses holds two tablets of Dude-related commandments. “We figured that if Moses were alive today, he’d be a Lebowksi fan,” he explains. “They follow some sort of religious-spiritual attitude about the movie,” notes Robin Jones, who is often recognised from the movie despite appearing, mute, in a single two-second shot. “Human beings still crave ritual,” another Achiever explains with a shrug – or the closest one can get to a shrug while dressed as a milk carton.

Certainly, there’s no shortage of comparisons between the Dude and Jesus (the Son of God, not the film’s bowling pederast): hair, beard, sandals, bathrobe, generally chilled attitude. Cathleen Falsani points up the connections in The Dude Abides: The Gospel According to the Coen Brothers, a theologically framed overview of the Coens’ career bearing on its cover a painting of Bridges’s character sporting a halo. So do several of the articles in Lebowski Studies, including Andrew Rabin’s A Once and Future Dude: The Big Lebowski as Medieval Grail-Quest. (For rug, he suggests, read grail: “a lost fetish object” that unifies the mundane and the divine, or “ties the room together”.) Like Jesus, Rabin writes, the Dude “is described sacrificially by the Stranger as ‘takin her easy for all us sinners.’”

Such connections notwithstanding, the Dude is really more of a Zen kind of guy; takin her easy, after all, is quite different to dying in agony. When Richard Gaughran asked 180 students to name “Dude-like qualities”, he reports in Professor Dude: An Inquiry into the Appeal of His Dudeness for Contemporary College Students (also in Lebowski Studies), the results included “serene”, “blissful”, “Zen”, “Taoistic” and “Buddha-esque”. Stormy, a fan seen in The Achievers getting a tattoo on her thigh that combines elements of bowling, Buddha and The Big Lebowski, would presumably agree.

So too would Oliver Benjamin, founder of the Church of the Latter-Day Dude, which is described on its homepage as a “philosophy that preaches non-preachiness, practices as little as possible, and above all, uh … lost my train of thought there”. Despite billing itself as “the slowest-growing religion in the world”, Dudeism has attracted more than 70,000 official adherents through its online ordination process.

A conscientiously articulated doctrine rather than merely a gag, Dudeism counts among its philosophical forebears Taoism, Zen Buddhism, American transcendentalism and humanism, and among its individual models of living Heraclitus, Walt Whitman and Snoopy. The movement offers equivalents of Old Testament lore, in the form of four books of Duderonomy, and the Tao Te Ching, reworked verse by verse as the Dude De Ching. Lao Tzu’s “For worship of Tao and honour of love/Are performed by being alive”, for instance, becomes “For abiding and honouring the Dude/Are performed by not being a fucking asshole”.

I studied yoga in India, I studied Buddhism in Thailand, I studied Javanese mysticism in Java,” Benjamin says in a recent car commercial featuring Dudeism, “but none of them really encapsulated a worldview that I thought actually meshed with modern times.” The Dude’s appeal in this time and place, it seems, lies in his acceptance of change, his indifference to worldly success and his appreciation of small pleasures. “Life is short and complicated,” as Benjamin puts it, “and nobody knows what to do about it. So don’t do anything about it. Just take it easy, man … that is to say, abide.” He’s echoing the Dude’s final line, delivered in a bowling alley in cruciform silhouette: “The Dude abides.” At fest screenings, it always causes the congregation to raise the roof.

Mark Kermode writes…

Mark Kermode: It’s only a movie | extract

from Latest film news and reviews | guardian.co.uk by Mark Kermode

The great iconoclastic film-maker Werner Herzog is used to shooting films – but being shot at? In this extract from his cinematic memoir Mark Kermode tells the remarkable story of how, in the middle of interviewing the German director on a hilltop in Los Angeles, he gets shot. And refuses to go to hospital. And there’s the day he meets Angelina… and other stories from a life obsessed with films…

We were somewhere near Lookout Mountain, on the outskirts of LA, when Werner Herzog’s trousers exploded. It was a small explosion, admittedly, as if a firecracker had gone off in his pocket. But it was an explosion none the less and in an area where unexpected bangs are to be treated with suspicion, if not outright alarm. Herzog had been shot – that much was clear – and was even now bleeding quietly into his boxer shorts as a tiny plume of smoke drifted photogenically from his pelvic region and into the evening air of LA. We stood there, the bold Bavarian with a bullet in his groin and the befuddled British film critic with ridiculous hair from Barnet, in a silence broken only by Herzog’s morosely German observation: “Someone is shooting at us. We should leave…”

Exactly what happened next is something of a blur – although unflattering video footage of myself hanging off a wire fence attempting to scramble round a precipitous overhang suggests that I did not proceed in an orderly fashion toward the nearest exit while taking care to remove any sharp objects or high heels. I do remember a profound sense of urgency which seemed strangely absent from Herzog’s own response. I put this down to deep cultural differences: Herzog grew up in exciting Germany, whereas I grew up in Barnet, a place so dull that a decapitated chicken once made the front page of the local press. All that was clear now was that Herzog had been shot (in the pantular region) and befuddled panic was top of my list of possible responses.

For Herzog, however, this was business as usual. As the maker of such rugged classics as Fitzcarraldo and Aguirre: Wrath of God, Herzog had long held a reputation as modern cinema’s most fearless foot soldier. Folklore had it that working on Herzog’s movies was all but indistinguishable from being in them, an idea crystallised in Les Blank’s brilliant documentary Burden of Dreams which found Herzog dragging a steamboat over a mountain in pursuit of his cinematic vision. Whereas Lucas or Spielberg would have used models or blue-screen special effects, Herzog simply went upriver into Peru where he introduced a real boat to a real mountain and filmed the resulting grudge match for real. Go Werner!

Time and again, the madness of Herzog’s on-screen adventures has been matched by perilous off-screen antics as the director searches for those rare moments of “ecstatic truth” which have become his signature. “I live my life, I end my life with this project,” he famously said of Fitzcarraldo and he wasn’t kidding. Among the life-threatening on-set adventures that haunted the movie is the story of the extra who got hit in the neck by an arrow which Herzog had to help remove on a kitchen table. Other key Herzog legends involve a crew member hacking his own foot off with a chainsaw after being bitten by a poisonous Peruvian snake. “It was very wise,” Herzog dead-panned. “The man survived.”

Nor has Herzog himself escaped the wrath of the movie gods. In Africa, he was thrown into jail after being suspected of organising a military coup (“It was another man they wanted whose name was Hertz – like the hire car”) and more recently he was handcuffed at an airport after the producers of Rescue Dawn pissed off the famously inflexible Thailand authorities. “Two of the producers are actually in jail right now,” Herzog admitted. “But that’s fine; what was wrestled away from that situation was a film. And the film is good!”

The zenith of Herzog’s life-or-death approach to film-making came when he famously used a gun to prevent leading man and “best fiend” Klaus Kinski from walking out on the odd couple’s greatest movie. No wonder he viewed getting shot at as so utterly unremarkable. In fact, the reason we were up on that wretched promontory by Lookout Mountain in the first place was Herzog’s declared expectation that he would probably get shot at if we stayed at his house.

Upon our arrival chez Herzog, our BBC director David Shulman had asked if we could get an establishing shot of me arriving at the house and meeting Herzog in his front garden. Herzog shook his head gravely and explained: “This is not a good idea. I do not want the outside of my house to be shown on television because I attract crazy people.” By way of example, Herzog recounted being in his office back in Munich when a woman arrived demanding to see him. She declared that the director was in league with 20th Century Fox to destroy her life. “She had a bag with her,” Herzog remembered, “and she began to reach inside it. I lunged across the table and grabbed it and in the bag was a gun. Loaded. It was somewhat upsetting.”

And that’s not all. Other attacks upon Werner’s person included someone “diving through my kitchen window at night, flying through it like Batman, a car jack in their hand”, the context and gravity of which I was frankly unable to comprehend. What was clear was that we probably didn’t want to be advertising Werner’s home address to any wandering whackos. Instead, we decided to take a drive uphill, up toward Lookout Mountain Avenue where the road arches majestically along the edge of the hill and the entire vista of smog-bound LA is laid out below.

When we reached the appointed place, it was impressive indeed, although annoyingly someone had fenced off the particular slice of roadside headland from which the best view of the city was available. Herzog insisted that the fence wasn’t there a couple of days ago and since it didn’t seem to be doing anything we decided to just scoot round it; after all, who was going to object to us walking on a bit of old scrubland? “In Germany,” intoned Werner sombrely as the cameras started to roll, “I’ve somehow left a paved road. Nobody cares about my films.”

It was a bleak assessment of his legacy in Europe, the continent Herzog had fled seeking artistic sanctuary in America. Having spent a lifetime refusing to play the mainstream movie game, it seemed both poignant and bizarre to find him here in the very heart of the beast, lurking on the outskirts of Hollywood.

And then he got shot or, as Herzog later termed it, “unsuccessfully shot”. Looking back on it now, the entire episode seems so bizarre that I’m inclined to think I must have made it all up. So I go to YouTube and put “Herzog/Kermode/Shot” into the search engine and there it is: Werner and me, together in LA, providing target practice for some nut-job with a BB gun (an air rifle). There’s Werner in his dark brown leather jacket, quietly complaining about his outsider status in Germany; there’s the weird cracking noise that was the only aural indication that anything untoward had happened; there’s the brief moment of confusion as Werner lifts his arm, looks down at his waist and wonders: “What was that?”

And then there’s the footage of me hanging off the fence trying to get back up on to the roadside, captured by David on his DV cam after the main camera stopped rolling at the first sound of gunfire. The effect is not dignified, although my hair seems to be standing up well. So not a complete disaster. Back in the car, David kept his video camera rolling as Werner strapped himself in, remarking with a frown: “Los Angeles is not really very friendly toward film-makers.” No kidding! We wanted to call the police and get Werner to a hospital, but he was having none of it. “It is not a significant bullet,” he kept repeating. “In Los Angeles, if you report a shooting they overreact. They send out a Swat team with helicopters and squad cars. We don’t need that.”

It was clear that Herzog wasn’t going to change his mind and so eventually we headed back down the hill toward his house, Werner trudging up the garden path, apparently resigned to the fact that he really did attract crazy people wherever he went.

Inside the house, David and the crew began to assemble the barrage of lights, cameras and dolly tracks that make any television interview look like a small-scale military intervention. Herzog eyed the expanding chaos with mild amusement before easing himself gingerly into his chair, ready and willing to be probed, if not actively penetrated. Herzog was engrossing and his company effervescent.

He spoke eloquently about Grizzly Man, the documentary he had just completed. Yet all the time we were talking, a voice in the back of my head kept saying: “He just got shot. He just got shot! Jeeze Louise, he really did really just get really shot. Really. Surely he’s hurt. What if he’s bleeding? What if he’s hurt and bleeding and I’m just sitting here talking to him about movies and ecstatic truth and all the while his insides are gradually becoming his outsides? What if the bullet’s still inside him? Isn’t that bad? Won’t it go septic? Damn, I can’t think straight. But that’s because I’m talking to a man who just got shot and has now probably got a bullet lodged in his abdomen. Why isn’t he weeping in pain?” Eventually, I could contain it no more. “Look Werner,” I blurted as the crew stopped to change tapes. “I can’t just go on not mentioning this. We have to talk about this whole getting shot thing.”

It is not signif… ”

I know it’s ‘not significant’ to you, but that’s because you’re Werner Herzog, the fearless Bavarian film-maker who has faced down death in the jungles of Peru. But I am Mark Kermode, the much less fearless film critic who once had 50p stolen from him by a tough-looking teenager on Whetstone High Street and thought that was pretty Mean Streets so it is not insignificant to me, OK? And about half an hour ago, I was standing next to you in gun-toting Los Angeles when smoke started to emerge from the waistband of your trousers. And to me that seems very significant indeed. And I need to talk about it. If that’s OK with you.”

It is OK,” Werner shrugged.

Great. Then when you’re ready, we’ll talk about it. On camera…”

The tapes started rolling again. I took a deep breath and tried to look casual.

So Werner, during the course of your career you’ve been shot at a couple of times. And in fact when we started this interview somebody took a shot at you and they hit you.”

Yes, yes,” Herzog beamed, apparently now finding this hilarious. “Yes, it hit me. I heard it. And it hurts a little bit.”

So have you got a wound?”

Yes. I think so.”

Well, show me. Let me see.”

Unperturbed, Werner got up and started to loosen the leather belt around his waist and undo the top of his trousers.

I’m sorry,” he intoned drolly, with just a hint of sauciness. “I shouldn’t do this on camera…”

The belt was lengthy, the buttons fiddly and the overall effect like some bizarrely clumsy striptease. Come Inside! Bavarian Film-Makers – All Nude! But with a degree of fumbling, Herzog got his trousers open and lifted up his jumper to reveal blood seeping through into his white woollen vest. Another layer was peeled back to reveal a pair of purple paisley boxer shorts now emblazoned with a darkening red patch. The surreal burlesque continued as the elasticated waistband of his boxers came down to reveal a palpable hole in Herzog’s abdomen where, as Billy Bragg once poetically put it, no hole should be.

The wound was about the size of a dime, with an angry red bruise spreading out from its enticing centre. For a second, Herzog teasingly fingered the surrounding flesh, causing the wound to gape briefly like the mouth of a tiny sea anemone. Then after this quick illicit flash the boxers came back up like the feathers of one of Mrs Henderson’s racy dancers and Werner was back – intacto.

But, Werner, you’re bleeding!” I protested.

It is not significant,” Werner repeated, retying his belt. “It does not surprise me to be shot at.”

The cameras stopped rolling and David called me over for a discreet word.

We need to get him to a hospital,” he said quietly.

I know, I know,” I whispered. “I’ve been thinking exactly the same thing.What if he gets septicaemia?”

Werner was wandering about, admiring the mini-DV cams, utterly at ease.

Look, Werner,” David and I said in unison, “we need to get you to a hospital.”

No!” he said firmly. ” No hospital!”

But why not? You’re hurt. What if you’ve been… damaged?

Because,” said Werner, “if I go to hospital with what looks like a gunshot wound then they call the police. It is a lot of trouble. And anyway, I am fine.”

David had a brief go at pulling rank with some “BBC health and safety regulations” shtick, but Werner was having none of it, so eventually we gave up. Defeated, we packed the gear into the vehicles, the cameras going into a van while David and I piled into his poky little rental car. We said goodbye to Werner and pulled away from the house, watching him waving from his garden looking exactly as he had looked when we arrived – apart from the bullet hole, obviously.

Back in London, we struggled to figure out how to put the piece together. The cameras had been rolling when the shot was fired and everything was captured – both sound and vision. But could we actually use any of that footage? Since Herzog had been so determined to downplay the entire event, wouldn’t we be exploiting him if we showed the shooting on TV? There also remained the issue of who was to blame for the whole weird affair – had we somehow inadvertently placed him in danger?

We needn’t have worried. A few days after our return to the UK, I started getting emails from people in LA who had heard all about Herzog and the “crazed sniper” – from Herzog himself. One particular contact sent me a digital photo of Herzog on the set of Harmony Korine’s new film (in which he played a small role) proudly displaying the wound to all and sundry. As the weeks went on, the story grew, appearing first in the Hollywood Reporter and then in newspapers in the UK. And as the story grew, two interesting things happened. First, Herzog’s stoical response to the shooting became increasingly matched and even outdone by a growing cowardliness on the part of the BBC crew. The braver he got, the more whimpering we became. By the time Herzog recounted the story to Henry Rollins on American TV a few months later, the Brits had been reduced to the status of quivering wrecks, fleeing at the first sign of danger as the Bavarian legend impassively took incoming fire.

The second result of all this press interest was a perhaps inevitable conspiracy theory which grew up on the internet (where else?) suggesting that the whole thing was a stunt designed to make Werner look brave and orchestrated by David Shulman and myself. Key to this interpretation was the offhand phrase which I had used to describe the effect of the bullet hitting Herzog’s trousers – that it looked as though a firecracker had gone off in his pocket. I had evidently repeated this phrase a few times on my return to England and through the usual process of half-heard Chinese whispers it had transmogrified into a private confession that I had planted a firecracker in Herzog’s trousers to make it look like he’d been shot. I had, in effect, blown up Werner’s boxers.

In the end, I thought I might as well join in the madness and recorded a video blog on the BBC’s Kermode Uncut site in which I confessed to having set up the whole Herzog shooting. If everyone says I did it – maybe I did. Maybe “real life” is only a movie after all…

Since then, whenever my path has crossed with Herzog’s, the story of the Lookout Mountain sniper and the “insignificant bullet” comes up. In 2009, I hosted an onstage Q&A with Herzog to celebrate his BBC4 World Cinema lifetime achievement award. Afterwards, Werner wandered over to say how much he’d enjoyed himself (as is traditional) and to ask if I was going to be back in LA anytime soon. “Yes, I’ve got to go and interview Coppola next month,” I replied, at which he seemed unimpressed. “Incidentally Werner,” I added, “have you still got a scar from where that bullet hit you during our interview?”

Oh yes,” he replied, although this time he didn’t get his trousers off to show me.

Does it ever hurt?” I asked

Only when I laugh,” he replied. “If I laugh really… profoundly, then I suddenly get a searing pain in my abdomen.” And with that we went our separate ways.

On the journey home, I thought about Herzog and that magic bullet and the peculiar way in which it had bonded us, the visionary, secularist, Bavarian film-maker and the dewy-eyed, God-bothering, liberal critic from Barnet. And I thought about the fact that every time Herzog, with all his rigorous anti-sentimentalism, was really enjoying himself he would feel an annoying pain in his side. And, in some poetically appropriate way, that pain would be me.

MY STORY, MY CHOICE

If my life were a TV movie of the week, who would play me? I’d like the answer to be Richard Gere, although physically the front runner is clearly Jesse Birdsall, on whose behalf I have been merrily accepting compliments about my sterling work in “that Spanish soap series” for years. Apparently, Birdsall and I are all but physically indistinguishable to the public at large and I’ve simply given up trying to tell people that I’m not him (I’ve even signed autographs “With best wishes from Jesse” to those who won’t take no for an answer).

Sometimes I wonder whether this is a two-way street and whether Mr Birdsall has ever been thumped for writing a rotten review of Blue Velvet or punched on the arm for dubbing Keira Knightley “Ikea Knightley” in honour of her on-screen teakiness. If so, I apologise. And Jesse, if you’re reading this, everyone really loved you in Eldorado.

But looks aren’t everything (did “Sir” Anthony Hopkins look anything like Nixon? Was Kevin Spacey a dead ringer for Bobby Darin?) and since we’re in the realms of fantasy here I should get to choose whoever I like to play me. And I choose Jason Isaacs.

Hello to Jason Isaacs. In case you don’t know (in which case shame on you), Jason Isaacs is just about my favourite actor in the whole gosh-darned world. He’s done everything from gritty TV dramas to romcoms, war flicks, fantasy films and sci-fi blockbusters. To some of you, he’ll be best known as the fiendish Lucius Malfoy from the Harry Potter films, but to me he is, in the words of David Bowie, chameleon, comedian, Corinthian and caricature.

More important, he is also the person whom I most wanted to be as a child. You see, Jason and I were at school together, in the same class, although we never really spoke or even acknowledged each other’s existence. I thought he was incredibly cool and aloof, being one of the first people at school to own a skateboard and the very first to swear out loud in an English class. If truth be told, I had a sort of schoolboy crush on Jason Isaacs and I’ve never really got over it. And if I get to choose who plays me in the movie of my life, then it’s Jason all the way – he knows the background, he’s done the research and he would look really good with a quiff.

So, the lead role in The Mark Kermode Story (we’ll need to come up with a better title – Easy Writer perhaps or The Man Who Watched The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance) goes to Jason, with John Malkovich co-starring as Werner Herzog (same shaped head and I’m pretty sure Malkovich could do Bavarian). Then, in the other assorted supporting roles, I’ll have Toby Jones as David Lynch (I’ve heard his impression and it’s really quite unusual), Samantha Morton as Linda Blair (because she’s tough and smart and great in pretty much everything) and David Morrissey as Noddy Holder (he’s got stature, plus he had good sideburns in Stoned, plus he was really funny in Basic Instinct 2 for which I retain a foolish fondness).The role of my long-suffering partner in crime Linda Ruth Williams will be filled by four-time Academy Award nominee Julianne Moore who will have to work pretty damned hard to look unimpressed by all the zany scrapes into which Mr Isaacs will get himself.

The Queen will play Dame Helen Mirren, obviously; Charles Hawtrey will play radio’s very own Simon Mayo (his choice, not mine); Ian Hislop will play my great friend Nigel Floyd (not physically similar, but a perfect match in attitude and mannerisms); and Ken Russell will play himself (I’ve already asked him and he’s said yes, as long as it’s only in my head).

Picture the scene. We open on a sepia-toned shot of an awkward young kid with stupid, unruly hair being mocked at school and called “Mr Pineapple Head”, which was just one of the terms used to deride my upstanding hair when I was young. Other insulting sobriquets included “Bogbrush”. The camera follows this scrawny kid home, alone, passing en route a cinema (showing a double bill of The Exorcist and Mary Poppins) and a desolate barber’s shop, the window of which showcases a handsome array of male hairdressing products and pomades.

Cut from here to the kid at home, spooning wax into his hair, with Elvis playing on a plastic Decca Dansette, his mum shouting from downstairs for him to come and have his tea, but his attention entirely gripped by the sleekly handsome quiff which he has skilfully crafted from his previously ragtag spikes.

The camera closes in on said quiff, delving into the hair like David Lynch’s extreme lawn close-up at the beginning of Blue Velvet which foretells great horrors to come. We pull back to reveal that very same hairstyle, utterly unchanged, although now it adorns the head of our adult star (Jason Isaacs to the set, please) whose barnet has remained immovable despite the passage of time and the ageing of his face.

After which we’d get the movie. Then, as the end approaches, we’d come to the crucial scene in which La Jolie (played by herself – as a favour to me) compliments Jason’s hair in the most effusive manner. He laughs nonchalantly but then, unexpectedly, seems to retreat into his own inner world. As the crowd of technicians and cameramen scuttle on the outskirts of the frame, we follow Mr Isaacs back to his dressing room where he sits silently in front of a mirror.

Slowly, the music starts to swell and, as it does so, we see Jason staring at his reflection, the distorted sounds of childhood taunts echoing around his head like the creepy kids’ nursery rhyme (“One, two, Freddy’s coming for you…”) in A Nightmare on Elm Street. As we watch, the reflected image of Jason’s face dissolves into a nostalgic scene of the previously awkward kid striding boldly through the school corridors, ignoring the jeers of his classmates, safe in the knowledge that his hair is immaculate and they are all just idiots. He is right, they are wrong. End of story.

ANGELINA LIKES MY HAIR

Angelina Jolie likes my hair. She said so. In those exact words.

I do like your hair,” she said, looking at my hair.

Do you?” I replied, pretending not to care, like Pooh Bear.

Yeah,” she confirmed, just in case there was any doubt.

Thank you very much,” I replied. “I like my hair too.”

And then, as an afterthought, Ange added: “I must get Brad to do that…”

Well of course he already did,” I burbled. “In that film Johnny Suede.” This was true. Before becoming officially the Sexiest Man in the World Ever, Brad Pitt had starred somewhat self-deprecatingly in a little, New York indie-pic directed by Tom DiCillo who famously shot Jim Jarmusch’s black-and-white cult favourite Stranger Than Paradise. The titular character was a somewhat dorky 1950s throwback who worships Ricky Nelson and sports a bouffant pompadour on which you could balance your hat, coat and shoes and still have space for a compact Wurlitzer jukebox. I really loved that movie and indeed the British poster consisted of a picture of Brad’s hair with the quote “Quifftastic! – Mark Kermode, Q magazine” emblazoned across it.

Oh, right,” said Angelina, nonplussed. “I never saw that movie…”

So that was that. I still wonder from time to time whether, in between bouts of photogenically physical interaction, Ange ever turned to her beloved and said: “Hey, I met this weird, middle-aged, English journalist with really great hair and I think you should try to look more like him…”

Probably not. Still, it’s something to tell the grandchildren. My grandchildren, not hers, obviously.

Top marks: Kermode’s favourite films

The Exorcist (1973) Greatest movie ever made – terrifying, uplifting, transcendent.

Local Hero (1983) ‘Brigadoon meets Apocalypse Now’ in Bill Forsyth’s charmer.

Silent Running (1972) Doug Trumbull’s lonely sci-fi gem – without which we wouldn’t have Wall-E.

It’s A Wonderful Life (1946) Suicidal despair, financial ruin, corruption – how’s that for a feelgood film?

Pan’s Labyrinth (2006) Guillermo del Toro’s Citizen Kane of fantasy cinema.

Mary Poppins (1964) Anyone who doesn’t get Poppins simply has no soul.

A Matter of Life and Death (1946) Powell and Pressburger’s after-life epic blends romance, philosophy and metaphysics.

Brazil (1985) The battle between dreams and reality played out in Gilliam’s masterpiece.

The Devils (1971) Ken Russell’s fiery classic, the director’s cut of which still remains shamefully unreleased.

Blue Velvet (1986) First time I saw it, I walked out. Wrong, wrong, wrong…!

TWC TBC?

I’ve always loved the Weinstiens, and who hasn’t right? They pioneered the idea of mini-majors and basically created Tarintino, Soderberg, Kevin Smith and a slew of other Indie (now not-so-indie-anymore) directors. But WTF has been going on behind those doors at The Weinstien Company (TWC) since they split form Disney? Here is a the long and short of it aggregated from other media sources to ensure your reading pleasure..

Now through the magic of The New York Times and Anne Thompson’s Thompson on Hollywood, I can bring you a condensed version of what’s going on with TWC.

The Weinstein Company was founded in 2005 after Bob and Harvey Weinstein left Miramax – the company they created in 1979.
Last month, the company hired Miller Buckfire, an investment consultant that specializes in companies close to bankruptcy and those that have pressing needs, to help restructure their debt. It’s not to say that things are impossible or even bleak for the company, but they are definitely taking steps to make sure that the walls of their castle are reinforced.

Back in 2005, TWC partnered with Goldman Sachs for $500 million in equity and an additional $500 in securitized debt.
(Securitized debt is essentially a long-term loan that’s been repackaged into marketable securities that are purchased by investors).

TWC has had a few missteps – most notably Grindhouse ($53 million budget/$25 million gross) – without many huge money-makers.

This year (2009), and with this year’s economy, isn’t much different unless Inglorious Basterds and Nine can pull in a solid amount of money.

Also in this awesome economy, the debt that TWC holds as securities isn’t worth as much, and it matures in 2014 – which seems like a long way away unless you’re a company looking straight ahead through the 2012 filmmaking season, desperately needing a win.

The statement from TWC regarding Miller Buckfire is that restructuring will allow them to expand their animation department while keeping everything else going at the same pace.
Which makes sense – so TWC might not be in as bad of trouble as it might seem.

However, the guarantor for a portion of that devalued debt, Ambac Financial Group, is having difficulties of its own.
So that sucks.

Like most companies within the past year, TWC had to fire 24 of its employees (out of its 218-person workforce) back in late 2008 while it was pouring money into an Oscar-campaign for the film The Reader (which only brought in $34 million).
The cherry on top for perspective – no Weinstein film has hit $100 million at the box office.

This little layout is from The Filmschool Rejects site

And here a more updated story on what’s going down from Niki Fink’s Deadline.com

Eric Robinson, a senior production exec at The Weinstein Company, is in talks to exit the company after a decade. CFO Larry Madden has already left. Meanwhile, there’s another round of massive layoffs coming along with talk of another restructuring. Seriously, how is that place surviving? To get down to its goal of 90 employees from 112, The Weinstein Co has to do more firing. Even if Nine does eke out a win or two this Sunday because of its 12 Golden Globe nominations, the most of any studio, thanks to Harvey’s usual manipulation campaign of those faux foreign journalists who make up the Hollywood Foreign Press Association, it’ll be too late: Nine is losing a shitload of theaters this coming weekend. And it’s a financial disaster.

How bad were the economics of Nine and its impact on The Weinstein Co? When it was also heavily funded by Relativity? First, you have to understand that my experience is that these two companies have a huge problem telling the truth about anything money-wise. Oy vey. But, from what I understand, the Nine financing was rather unique.

TWC produced the feature but only took foreign rights. Given the pedigree of the project and cast, it did well “selling” the film to distributors around the world for an advance guaranty. (Unlike a major studio, companies like TWC sell off the foreign rights to distributors in each territory). Both TWC and Relativity claim $50 million in foreign sales was generated. But my sources not only very much doubt that number, they laugh at it.

But let’s assume for the moment that this is correct. TWC then sold the domestic rights to Relativity. TWC agreed to market and distribute the film on behalf of Relativity in the U.S. for a 15% fee. Relativity claims it put up up advance of $16 million, but my sources say it was close to $30 million for domestic.

Relativity insists it did not cover P&A on Nine, rather TWC did. My sources say the film will never recoup its P&A understood to be $45 million. (Relativity insists that’s a “very inflated and inaccurate” figure. But they also don’t correct it. My sources say it’s right.)

Both TWC and Relativity will get hurt together. And both companies say these projections on Nine are wrong. So let’s do the math: The film’s box office is currently $17+ million. Let’s be generous and say it ends up at $25 million. This is North American box office, so when you take out Canada (which was licensed to Alliance as a pre-sale), the U.S. will be around $22.5 million. Translated to gross film rental (what the distributor takes from the box office), there will be about $10.7 million taken in By TWC. Add PPV - $1.25 million, DVD/VOD - $17.5 million, Pay TV - $3.5 million, Free TV - $2.5 million, and the total is $35.7 million in revenue.

Now compare the costs: Theatrical P&A - $45 million, Residuals - $2 million, Gross Participations - ?, TWC Distribution Fee (15%) - $5.35 million, DVD Marketing and Distribution Costs - $7 million, and the total is $59.35 million (without any assumption for gross participations).

Since The Weinstein Co is responsible for the P&A costs, then they will lose at least $20 million on the film ($25 million shortfall, minus the $5.35 million fee they earn for distributing on behalf of Relativity).

As for The Weinstein Co, it’s supposedly considering several deals to restructure its finances yet again while its liquidity is on life support and its creditors breathe down their necks.

Isn’t moviemaking a fun business?

THANK YOU NIKI!

Isn’t moviemaking a fun business!

Pirate Bay continue..

In the spirit of true “Piratism” it doesn’t seem that even jail can stop them. Recently the 4 millionth user signed up. Check-out Freakbits for rad info on all things pirate - read comments for user info and links.

Despite the numerous lawsuits that have been targeted at The Pirate Bay, the notorious BitTorrent site welcomed its 4 millionth user last weekend.

Founded in 2003, the initial goal of the Pirate Bay founders was to build the first Scandinavian BitTorrent community. Due to the enormous international interest in the (former) tracker the operators of the site changed their initial plans and made the site available in multiple languages a year after it was launched.

Since then the number of users has grown by thousands a week, reaching a milestone of 4 million registered users a few days ago.

Its popularity didn’t go unnoticed to Hollywood and the major record labels either. This year there have been several lawsuits that targeted the site, and in April four people associated with The Pirate Bay have been sentenced to a year jail time and hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines. This landmark case will be appealed in 2010.

Despite, or perhaps due to, all the attention the site has continued to grow, and there are no signs that this will be halted anytime soon.

What does a Producer Do?

Here’s a nice little vid on what various producer roles mean and where they fit into the title sequences…. talking mostly from the perspective of TV but there is crossing over.

A little bit about 3D TV

Richard and I had a little talk about 3D recently. Rich was more optimistic than me on on the roll-out of 3D over the next while and where I agree is that we will see more 3D films coming out. Where I disagree is that in 5 years we will all be watching 3D TV’s. I may still be wrong:

3D TVs one-up theaters
Director Cameron says movies better raise their game
By DAVID S. COHEN

From Variety

The flatscreen HDTVs at the Consumer Electronics Show were absolutely dazzling. Color, contrast and clarity are better all the time. OLED displays are the brightest and thinnest yet. And of course, stereoscopic 3D TV is finally a reality.But watching the latest and greatest in TVs, I couldn’t help but flash to a warning James Cameron sounded last week for the movie industry.

As 3D starts to come into the living room, and come in at higher frame rates, then we’re gonna have to up our game again. ‘Cause movies can’t look worse than what you’re getting at home,” Cameron told Daily Variety in a wide-ranging interview coming soon to Variety.com.

Cameron’s comment came when we asked if on “Avatar” sequels he’d push for a higher frame rate, which deliver a clearer picture and less “strobing,” or motion blur, the way he pushed for 3D over the past decade.

He said TV will force movies to change — and not for the first time.

Though it will be years before today’s high-end sets are widely adopted by viewers, the HDTVs on display at CES were loaded with technology to improve moving images that, in some ways, aren’t as good as the flatscreens we watch them on.

Even today’s digital cinema standard is left in the dust by the latest and greatest from TV makers. Some companies showed “4K2K” TVs, with far more pixels than a 2K digital cinema projector throws on the screen. Panasonic’s mammoth 152-inch 4K2K plasma would be an upgrade over many screening rooms.

Some makers, including LG and Toshiba, have put graphics processors into flatscreens, in part to correct motion blur. LG’s Trumotion attacks motion blur by running at 480 fps, even when the source is 24 or 30 fps. Where do the extra frames come from? Partly from the built-in GPU, which interpolates new three frames to smooth out the difference between two frames of normal video. In other words, movies and HD video don’t have enough frames to stop the strobing, so three out of every four frames on Toshiba’s HDTV screens have to be made up by the TV set itself.

Strobing is an inevitable result of the 24 fps standard adopted decades ago. “It’s not fast enough,” Cameron said flatly. “It should never have been 24. It probably should’ve been 36 as a minimum.”

It’s been proven that faster frame rates improve the picture just as more pixels do.

He wanted to shoot “Avatar” at 48 fps, but “everybody just looked at me cross-eyed with that one.” Besides, rendering all those extra frames of visual effects would have been too expensive.

That said, “If you couple 3D with higher frame rate, you’ll blow people’s minds,” Cameron said. “People think their minds are being blown by ‘Avatar’ - we could blow your mind with 48frame-per-second 3D.”

Cameron doesn’t expect to do a lot of tubthumping for higher frame rates. Changing standards in TV will make movies change with them.

He points to the history of color in movies. Black-and-white films lingered for about 15 years after the invention of color movie film, and during those years, color TV was introduced as a high-end product. For the 1966-67 TV season, though, the three networks went to all-color lineups. Not coincidentally, in 1967 the Academy abolished the black-and-white cinematography Oscar.

The second color television came in,” Cameron said, “boom! Everything was in color.”

There you have it.

2010 and The Film maker

I’ve really come to like the end of a year. A place where becoming nostalgic over the last years events is acceptable and coming up with ideas of the future year dinner time conversation. Having a hint of optimism in thought brings out the best in us and so our futures seem bright and full of opportunity. Now having practiced some of this rhetoric together with vast amounts of wine “tasting” this past festive season I would like to share my view on what we could expect of 2010 in the context of film making.

The recession is the first thing that comes to mind and the fact that the mini-major is a dwindling business operation. The middle-man it seems is dead although the idea of major studios investing in smaller films is far from it. With successes like Paranormal and even to some extent District 9 the major studios know that there is still great money to be made on film makers with a good idea. Thus the $1 000 000 movie is going to make a come-back. Studios may have sold or liquidated their money spending teen-age studios but that wont deter them from trying to find that golden nugget that will cost them next to nothing and earn them the same as a one of the tent-poles.

This year will be an up for SA films. More being released this year that 2009 for sure! Consider most films produced last year where predominantly funded in 2008 so just before the great depression (sic) and will be coming out this year. Just of the cuff, Nightdrive, Master Harold and the boys, Schuster 2010, Bang-Bang Club and I believe there’s a White Wedding 2 in the making…? This output will either help to increase the long tail productivity of our indy industry with good stories made well or otherwise not do anything and a re-hash of ill-made films will be still be our cross to bear.

The advent of super-success of SA stories globally is giving us a moment in the sunshine. This year more producers will be selling their wares than before. The generation of capitol investment for film will go into up-turn due to some hard selling in the international markets where we (as an industry) have been going for years. This investment up-turn may be small on a local scale as we as film makers try to steal the imaginations and bank balance points of those more “fortunate” than us. However this is still a battle for some years to come. I presume most of the income generation for films in 2010 will come from international sources.

There have been more treaties signed with countries like Ireland and France which will all lead to more options and scope for co-productions. The only potential stumbling block is the R10 mil DTI cap for bigger blockbuster style films. However, this cap is great for smaller films and up-and-coming producers. Relations with SADC is is also becoming a potential gold-mine for investment. New companies like Black Irish in Johannesburg are making their first features on the giant back which is Africa. Even Big World Cinema in Cape Town is making some core business choices to include and produce African cinema.

Government and economic policy is still not clear on section 21 TAX and although producers in SA are doing their best to make it a working system its stays a point of contention. It will still be the DTI 35% rebate that carries most sales and now with an offer of 70% of gap-financing to afford a completion bond the DTI is setting itself up as the daddy of film finance.

To talk about the NFVF only hurts and one line that comes to mind is “good intentions pave the way to hell”. So far their politically charged agendas have done little to create a sustainable, intelligent and entertaining industry. Don’t let that deter you though, they do have a mandate and a budget and if you have the project and the pitch go get yours…

The ex-film schooler will find out that this is a hard nut to crack but opportunities lie in making good content. I hope to see some “bed-head cinema” this year from fringe film makers. I hope to get invited to some screenings in apartments and basement. Films that shock, that are terrible and majestic. This is why the indy-world is so great. Anything is possible.

How will the soccer affect us? I’m not sure. But if you have a soccer film about a young black boy making it and fulfilling his dream (in soccer) despite the obvious obstacles, thats a good place to start.

Enjoy this year of 2010 and keep that slither of optimism about you, its what brings out the best in us after all.